Call-center users and GPU-intensive designers have different OS/app baselines, capacity limits and maintenance windows. The company wants predictable scaling and controlled image updates. Which design is most suitable?

✓ Correct answer

• Separate workload-specific host pools with tested images, limits and scaling policies.

Workload-specific pools provide clear image, capacity and maintenance boundaries when requirements differ materially. Option explanations: A. One pool with a single maximum session limit chosen for the lightest workload.: A limit for light users is unsafe for the heavier workload and does not separate lifecycle. B. One personal host shared simultaneously by all users.: A personal assigned host does not establish this shared multi-workload pool design. C. Separate workload-specific host pools with tested images, limits and scaling policies.: Separate pools let each workload use compatible capacity and an independent lifecycle. D. One image definition whose description lists both applications, without deploying them.: Description metadata does not provide the required apps or workload separation. Sources: Azure Virtual Desktop terminology — https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/terminology; Session host sizing guidelines — https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/session-host-virtual-machine-sizing-guidelines

Read the source reference