A pilot has 0.5% packet loss. Its owner claims that meeting the published minimum Mbps per workload is enough to approve the branch network. What should the reviewer conclude?

✓ Correct answer

• The stated loss exceeds the guidance's conditions, so investigate loss and retest the experience

The pilot falls outside the network conditions attached to the recommendations. Correct or characterize packet loss and test realistic sessions before approval. Option explanations: A. Only the total number of licensed users needs recalculation: Concurrency matters, but recalculating licenses does not address measured loss. B. The Mbps table guarantees smooth sessions at any loss rate: The table has a stated packet-loss condition and cannot guarantee this pilot's result. C. The stated loss exceeds the guidance's conditions, so investigate loss and retest the experience: The recommendations assume less than 0.1% packet loss; meeting Mbps alone does not validate this path. D. A larger profile disk will compensate for packet retransmissions: Storage capacity does not repair packet loss. Sources: Network guidelines — https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/network-guidance

Read the source reference