An organization needs shared subscription guardrails, connectivity, and operating ownership before moving applications. It also needs to assess the reliability of each application. Which framework pairing best fits these needs?

Choose the single best answer.

A.Azure Monitor for the shared foundation and Azure Policy for workload architecture
B.CAF for both purposes without any workload-level review
C.WAF for subscription ownership and CAF for application fault analysis
D.CAF for the shared foundation and WAF for workload quality

Show the answer and explanation

✓ Correct answer

CAF for the shared foundation and WAF for workload quality

CAF connects adoption readiness and shared foundations; WAF reviews workload quality through its pillars. Reversing their roles misses this distinction. Monitor and Policy are useful implementation services rather than substitutes for architecture frameworks. CAF alone does not replace a workload quality review. Source guide: PDF page(s) 4-5.

Read the source reference

This item is flagged for content review.

Read and review here, or open the app to practise and save your results on this device.

Practise in the app

Unofficial study aid; not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft. Original practice questions are not real examination questions and do not guarantee an exam result.