A write-intensive application cannot rely on the recovery behavior of a sudden power-off snapshot. Which recovery-point type should be preferred where supported?

Choose the single best answer.

A.Crash-consistent points assumed always identical to application-consistent points
B.Application-consistent points coordinating the application's recoverable state
C.An OS-only image that excludes all data disks
D.A VM placement change that automatically validates database writes

Show the answer and explanation

✓ Correct answer

Application-consistent points coordinating the application's recoverable state

Application consistency coordinates eligible state. Crash consistency may need application log replay and is not equivalent. Excluding business disks omits data; placement is fault isolation rather than validation of recovery state. Source guide: PDF page 37-38.

Read the source reference

This item is flagged for content review.

Read and review here, or open the app to practise and save your results on this device.

Practise in the app

Unofficial study aid; not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft. Original practice questions are not real examination questions and do not guarantee an exam result.