Practice question 58 of 498 · hard
An application team proposes aggressive fail-closed dependencies that meet a security requirement but breach a documented availability target during identity outages. What should the architecture review do?
Choose the single best answer.
Show the answer and explanation
✓ Correct answer
- Evaluate the security and reliability tradeoff and design an approved approach that meets the stated requirements
Evaluate the security and reliability tradeoff and design an approved approach that meets the stated requirements: Well-Architected requires consideration of interacting quality pillars. Ignore reliability because only Security is a Well-Architected pillar: Reliability is also a pillar and the business requirement remains relevant. Disable all authorization permanently to meet availability: This discards the security requirement rather than resolving the tradeoff. Assume a CAF landing zone automatically settles application failure behavior: The workload still needs an explicit design and assessment.
Read and review here, or open the app to practise and save your results on this device.
Unofficial study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft. These are original learning questions, not actual exam questions. Product capabilities and exam objectives can change; verify current Microsoft documentation. Practice scores do not predict or guarantee an exam result.