StudyByteLearn
← SC-100: Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect
SC-100 · Microsoft 365 Intune Purview and Copilot

Practice question 378 of 498 · hard

An architect evaluates a SaaS protection proposal. Which two statements correctly identify limits or dependencies? Select two.

Select all that apply. Every correct option and no extras are required for credit in the app.

  1. A.Session enforcement requires support for the target application and client access path
  2. B.OAuth permission abuse can require governance beyond browser session policies
  3. C.Discovering an app proves it has been blocked
  4. D.Defender for Office 365 replaces all SaaS OAuth consent governance
  5. E.Connecting any SaaS app guarantees identical blocking actions
Show the answer and explanation

✓ Correct answers

  • Session enforcement requires support for the target application and client access path
  • OAuth permission abuse can require governance beyond browser session policies

App and client support determine session coverage, and OAuth API access requires appropriate app governance. Connected apps do not all offer identical enforcement, discovery is not proof of blocking, and email protection does not replace consent governance.

Read the source reference

Read and review here, or open the app to practise and save your results on this device.

Unofficial study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft. These are original learning questions, not actual exam questions. Product capabilities and exam objectives can change; verify current Microsoft documentation. Practice scores do not predict or guarantee an exam result.